There was so much random cerebration, that the fastest traveler in the universe which resides in my brain made me go through. I find them quite intriguing and trivial simultaneously. I have presented here a few of them :
1. We often dislike people for the sole reason of mismatch of our opinions with theirs. We misconstrue this mismatch with dislike for that person. So, if we can realize this we may never detest any one but their thoughts. But, don't you think a person is actually his 'thoughts'? Or they are actually discrete.
2. The next thought that followed is that this mismatch may not always create abomination.
I find two cases that lead to the above state: (a) finding ourselves in a state of guilty or impuissance due to this mismatch. (b) When we think that we are right and others are wrong, ignorant of the truth behind truth of right and wrong.
3. Who/What decides what is right and what is not? Is the ability to distinguish these two inherent? Or the so called 'prick of conscience' elucidated in the Moral Science class, is entirely at the mercy of a person's cognition? ( I don't believe in universal applicability of all right and wrongs based on the majority of followers.). Then who should be penalized for one erroneous deed? Oneself or one's cognitive abilities.
4. Are we simply being hypocrites or opportunists when we choose our food habits? let me explain. Most of us cannot even envisage the thought of deliberate killing of a living being by ourselves. We love our 'pets'. But we don't hesitate for a moment when we eat an animal killed by someone else. We pay money for the murder. Its not for an inception of the hackneyed debate between vegetarians and non-vegetarians. Its an incentive brood over a ubiquitous but commonly ignored aspect.
5. The idea of infinity in definiteness and vice versa. The abstract feeling of infinite points within a finite length of a line segment. The thought of infinity in a thought of a finite epoch. An infinite set of real numbers (between two whole numbers) actually being many of the infinite subsets of an infinite set real numbers. I think I found a relating video
1. We often dislike people for the sole reason of mismatch of our opinions with theirs. We misconstrue this mismatch with dislike for that person. So, if we can realize this we may never detest any one but their thoughts. But, don't you think a person is actually his 'thoughts'? Or they are actually discrete.
2. The next thought that followed is that this mismatch may not always create abomination.
I find two cases that lead to the above state: (a) finding ourselves in a state of guilty or impuissance due to this mismatch. (b) When we think that we are right and others are wrong, ignorant of the truth behind truth of right and wrong.
3. Who/What decides what is right and what is not? Is the ability to distinguish these two inherent? Or the so called 'prick of conscience' elucidated in the Moral Science class, is entirely at the mercy of a person's cognition? ( I don't believe in universal applicability of all right and wrongs based on the majority of followers.). Then who should be penalized for one erroneous deed? Oneself or one's cognitive abilities.
4. Are we simply being hypocrites or opportunists when we choose our food habits? let me explain. Most of us cannot even envisage the thought of deliberate killing of a living being by ourselves. We love our 'pets'. But we don't hesitate for a moment when we eat an animal killed by someone else. We pay money for the murder. Its not for an inception of the hackneyed debate between vegetarians and non-vegetarians. Its an incentive brood over a ubiquitous but commonly ignored aspect.
5. The idea of infinity in definiteness and vice versa. The abstract feeling of infinite points within a finite length of a line segment. The thought of infinity in a thought of a finite epoch. An infinite set of real numbers (between two whole numbers) actually being many of the infinite subsets of an infinite set real numbers. I think I found a relating video